A good day for Conservatism!

WooHOO!!!

It’s a great day for Conservatism!

Yeah, Doug Hoffman lost.

Or did he?

Yeah… he isn’t going to Washington this year to take a seat as a Representative from New York’s 23rd District. But he would never be able to buy the vast amount of publicity and support he got as a result of his candidacy. In politics that is not considered a loss.

With true conservative supporters like Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Mark Levin, Tim Pawlenty (to name a few), Doug Hoffman came from virtually nowhere to showcase the glaring differences between the traditional Conservative and more moderate Republican hierarchy of Newt Gingrich, Pete Sessions (R-TX), The RNC, The National Republican Congressional Committee, and I could go on.

Like Sarah Palin, Doug Hoffman is from the outside and thereby not truly welcomed by the Washington and ‘Country Club Blueblood’ Republican elitists. OH, if he had won they would give their congratulations, but he would not be welcomed into the upper echelon and inner sanctums of the ‘anointed ones’ of the Republican Party.

I heard someone postulate about how the Hoffman defeat will hurt his supporters… ye-ah… ri-ight…

Sarah, Michelle, Rush… these will not suffer, but will instead reap vast rewards from the Conservative base because they stood up and supported him from the get-go. I thought it funny that Saturday when Dede Scozzafava bailed and then promptly turned around and, for lack of a better word: screwed both the RNC & the NRCC. From whom she had taken over one million dollars. I guess that’s the kind of gratitude you can expect when you handpick someone as shady as she proved to be.

Ooohhh… I guess I shouldn’t be so hard on her should I?

Well, now, lets take a look at who Newt, Steele, and the rest of the “we don’t need or want Conservatives” in our Republican Party were trying to shove down the voters of NY-23’s throats: Dede Scozzafava
This woman leans further to the left than even Bill Owens!
· She is all in favor of the Stimulus Bill, a departure from her “fellow” Republicans.
· A supporter of big labors favorite bill – card-check.
· A… cozy relationship with Obama’s favorite group of community action figures: ACORN and their allies Working Families Party. Barack Obama was strongly endorsed by the Working Families Party.
· A supporter of both abortion and legislation to codify same-sex marriage she ran counter to the values of the Conservatives.
I will say this for her: she was endorsed by the NRA. Hmmm…?

And then there is the truly smarmy way she acted after bowing out of the race.

And I don’t care how Newt wants to tell it that she did the “statesman like thing in dropping out…”. Newt, Newt, Newt… you used to be a teacher. A history teacher at that, when did a TRUE statesman act as petty as this woman? You need to go back to Georgia and teaching and relearn what Conservatism really is.

But… I think that there are a lot of people who NEED to either learn or relearn what Conservatism is and how it fits in the Republican Party.

And after last night, I believe that whether they like it or not the ‘Country Club Bluebloods’ are going to have to sit up, put down their Manhattans and pay attention.

Even though Doug Hoffman will not be packing his suitcase and catching the 5:14 to Washington this time, his time is just another year away.

Both the Republican and Democrat Parties are now on notice that the liberal, money-spending, power-grabbing attitude in politics is not what the public wants.

This really puts the pressure on the Blue-Dog Democrats who now have to seriously rethink their positions and who they throw their support behind Big Barry, Nancy Pah-losi, and that little dweeb in the Senate… oh yeah, Harry Reid. **Heard where he was trying to strong-arm Joe Leiberman and lie about how Joe was onboard for the rationed government healthcare scam, I mean bill.**

Anyway, now where does that leave Screecher Nancy Pah-losi? Is she going to try strong-arming her new Representative Bill Owens? What good is that going to do? Realistically he is not going to be returned after the 2010 elections. And what tactic can she use against the Blue-Dog Democrats?

I mean, what are their options?
1.Vote for the rationed government healthcare scam and go home to angry constituents who would not vote for them as dog-catcher?
2.Or go against Pah-losi and be the walking dead in the House, not getting assigned to any committees?

The Blue Dog Democrats can see that if they plan to continue parking their backsides in those House (and Senate) seats, they need to stick to their Conservative leanings. This will pose a problem for them for two reasons: Nancy Pah-losi will render them impotent in their seats, and George Soros has already come out threatening anyone who doesn’t tow the line with backing whoever is challenging them for their position in the Democrat Party.

With that in their minds and the minds of a LOT of Republicans they have to take into consideration the impact his race has made on the political scene…

Here we have a guy who is not even given a chance by the Republican big-wigs. When the people who actually vote realized what ‘their’ Party was foisting on them they went looking at other opportunities within the Party. A candidate with values and principles aligned to theirs.

No real third party candidate, just another Republican who still believed in Conservative values. Something which has been lacking the last few years from the Republican Party of Newt Gingrich, Michael Steele, and others.

Then, with a stumbling, bumbling campaign fraught with not enough money and having to play ‘catch-up’ football, he came from behind and to within less than a mere 5,000 votes of winning. Without, in fact, with the OPPOSITION of the Republican Party.

What should this tell Newt and all his ‘better-than-thou’ Republicans?

The people don’t want his kind of Republican Party. Or a Democrat Party that is sucking the life out of this country, for that matter.

Less than 5,000 votes… That many? Wow… that’s like… what a 5 percent margin… at most… Well… color me impressed by the wild landslide Bill Owens had here. **yawn**

Gimme a minute here to wonder what Bill Owens is thinking. All the air in the room was and still is being devoted to the Hoffman/Scozzafava dustup. I doubt anyone would have noticed if Bill Owens were to have given his acceptance speech in the buff.

So? Did the Democrats really win yesterday?

Did they? Erick Erickson at RedState.com points out that “While the Democrats are crowing a bit this morning over the unusual circumstances of NY-23, they might want to pay attention to one under-reported fact: Bill Owens, the man NY-23 sent to Congress last night, campaigned against the public option.”

Back to my question: Did the Democrats win yesterday? Not really, the groundswell of Conservatism will see this as reassurance they are on the right road, and the Blue Dog Democrats are now in one heck of a tough spot. They now see that if they go along with Big Barry…
Oh, did I mention that the two other major races yesterday were both lost by Democrats who Big Barry had condescended to stump for… uht O!

Hey Bill, walking around with a sign-board over your front and back may get people to notice you. Just saying, dude…

Obama buying Senior vote

First there was Big Barry telling supposedly homeless Henrietta Hughes in Florida that he would take care of her and make sure she was not going to be homeless anymore.

Then there were the two women in front of Cobo Center in Detroit who had this exchange with WJR reporter Ken Rogulski:

ROGULSKI: Why are you here?
WOMAN #1: To get some money.
ROGULSKI: What kind of money?
WOMAN #1: Obama money.
ROGULSKI: Where’s it coming from?
WOMAN #1: Obama.
ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get it?
WOMAN #1: I don’t know, his stash. I don’t know. (laughter) I don’t know where he got it from, but he givin’ it to us, to help us.
WOMAN #2: And we love him.
WOMAN #1: We love him. That’s why we voted for him!
WOMEN: (chanting) Obama! Obama! Obama! (laughing)

Now we have Big Barry doing it again, only this time he’s trying to buy off the country’s senior citizens with a $250 check to get their support for his rationed government healthcare scam.

I guess he thinks that they are stupid or drugged up enough that they won’t remember that he and his minions have secured a zero cost of living increase in their benefits. Instead, he is going to reach into his stash and slide them each a check for $250.

Can I be breathless here with the generosity of our Dear Leader?

Just at the time he and this charlatan brigade in the Congress are set for their final push to rahm their rationed, public-option, government healthscam down our throats.

Hey, you ever want to see Dailey style Chicago politics in action? Now is your chance!
Hurry, hurry, hurry, step right up and watch the Big Bamster attempt yet another flim-flam in front of your VERY eyes!!!

Just like the women in Detroit, Henrietta Hughes, all the people who voted for him because they believed him when he said that he would take care of them.

“Oh, Obama is gonna pay my mortgage, he’s gonna take care of my bills…” I actually know of one person who, the day after election day walked into his employers office and gave his notice.

Said that he didn’t need a job anymore because Obama was going to take care of him, that was why he voted for Obama…

Ye-ah… ri-ight…

And now Big Barry is going to try it again, only this time with the senior citizens of this country.

I wonder how long it will be before the Executive Director of the Senior Citizen League, Shannon Benton, will be vilified for coming out against this hocus-pocus plan and her questioning Big Barry?

“It is not nearly enough to compensate for the rising costs seniors have been enduring for years. Today, a senior can buy just 80% of what they could have afforded at the beginning of the decade – and $250 does not address that terrible trend in an effective manner.”

What the…? Hey…

Hey lady, yeah you with the big glasses and cute smile, you wanna hold it down, we have a smoke and mirrors show to do here.

Reid and Pelosi fighting posting bills online and allowing public to see them

You HAVE GOT to be KIDDING!

Now, Reid and Puh-losi are locked in a vicious battle to stop the public and even the very lawmakers who are to vote on the rationed government healthcare bill from having access to the bill prior to its being voted on!

Now correct me here… but i remember Big Barry ran around all over this country when he was still candidate Barry telling the slavering masses about how he was going to make sure this would be a ‘transparent’ government.

Well… so much for just another of his outright lies.

And before you go screaming about various past bills which were passed with little or no prior public inspection or debate, let’s go over them.

And while you read these think about how they have impacted the US and life as we know it now:

**June 26, 2009. House energy and global warming bill. 1,200 pages. Only available 15 hours prior to being voted on. Oh, it passed and we have ABSOLUTELY NO idea of the cost of THAT!

** Feb. 14, 2009. The $789 billion stimulus bill, 1,100 pages. lets see… this mess was put online 13 hours before being debated and voted on. Passed. Show me the jobs this has created. Ye-ah… ri-ight…

**Oct. 3, 2008. Financial sector rescue package. 169 pages. 29 hours before being voted on. WOW, 29 hours! 29 hours to decide how to spend over 700 billion dollars that had been confiscated from hardworking American men and women. Oh, it passed.

Wait a minute, i thought Big Barry said that there would be a three day waiting period to go over any legislation being considered… now i know that my education is only a public government school education but i do know that even a union member would have a REAL tough time stretching 15 hours, 13 hours or even 29 hours out to make any of them equal three days.

Oh but i guess we can’t look at how this administration and their lackey’s in the two houses of the Congress don’t seem to remember or don’t care about walking their talk.

HOLD on just a minute, i just remembered why we can’t hold these examples of their frontin’ on this: we have to blast Bush because… well Big Barry inherited all this mess, and well, back on Oct. 23rd, 2001 he got the USA Patriot domestic surveillance bill passed without it being available to the public before it was debated on.

It does not matter that we are comparing apples to avocados at this point, to the administration and their sycophantic fools in the media it is just enough to scream “Bush, Bush, Bush…!”

Just over a month before, on September 11, 2001 this country had been attacked by Islamic TERRORISTS in their ongoing war against us. These are NOT stupid people. They had taken the time to learn the weaknesses in our defense and had exploited those weaknesses.

I wonder, had the Patriot Act been opened up to everyone getting to look at it… what would the effect on this country be today? What has happened and NOT been allowed to happen because of the Patriot Act?

This is legislation that will change the economic landscape of this country in that it will takeover six percent of the economy of this country.

This legislation will reorder the way you live your life and the choices you will have. Not the choices you will make but the CHOICES YOU WILL HAVE AVAILABLE!

Is it ANY wonder that Big Barry, Reid, and Puh-losi are doing EVERYTHING in their power to get this collectivist legislation pushed through without it ever seeing the light of scrutiny?

They know that it is a travesty and will destroy this country. But what do they have to care: they won’t be in power when it falls apart and they can in turn start screaming that their friends need to be put in power to straighten out the mess.

Roman Polanski… was it rape?

So now we hear that it’s ok to have sex with a thirteen year old as long she doesn’t say no.

There’s rape and there’s rape… and well, he IS Roman Rolanski. So he was actually doing her a favor by supposedly getting her so drugged up on champagne and ‘Ludes’ she had NO idea of what was going on.

Quaaludes by themselves are ENOUGH to do that. Trust me on my knowing this… i just made it into my mid-fifties… do the math… ’nuff said?

Anyway, so Roman Polanski supposedly gets this girl doped up and then allegedly proceeds to rape her. Oh yeah, HE says she agreed… i would think he would say that. Who is going to question the Great Roman Polanski? And just why is he so revered?

Be—cause he is one of the greatest directors of all time. Puh-leeze, Chinatown was good… well Faye Dunaway was good, but i kinda think her and Candice Bergen… i’ll stop there.

But the fact remains: anyone else other than the Great Roman Polanski does something like this and they are vilified and the crowds are screaming for their heads on a stake.

Oh, if it wasn’t rape, why did he run off to Europe, always making sure never to enter a country from which he might extradited back to the States from? Hmmmm…?

A forced sexual act whether the person is cognizant of the act or not is RAPE!

Yes RAPE! One, she was WELL under 18. Under the law, she is not capable of giving her consent. Two, she was in NO condition, even if she had been FIVE YEARS OLDER to give her consent. Under either of these conditions she is unable to enter into a contract. And allowing someone to perform a sex act with her constitutes a verbal contract. She was neither old enough or clear-headed enough to enter into said verbal contract.

I’m seeing an unintended consequence here also: if this holds up…
getting a thirteen year old drugged up and taking advantage of her sexually doesn’t qualify as RAPE… the precedent this may set could set womens advocacy, rape prevention and prosecutions back fifty years.

“Well, yer honor… yeah, i knowd she was thirteen, and after a bottle a’ Jim Beam… why hell, neither ov us knew what we was a’doin’. But she was ok with it. I mean she nodded when i asked her ’bout doin’ it.”

Well, if your name is Roman Polanski… it just might work.

NEVER forget!

Lest anyone forget September 11, 2001

Who is getting more air-time: Rep. Wilson or Obama?

In case you weren’t listening in rapt attention to the hundred and something-eth speech Big Barry made last night, midway through the speech Representative Joe Wilson said what most of us know to be true and are saying everyday.

“YOU LIE!”

Yeah, his timing kinda sucks, but he was saying what we all know to be true.

Will this hurt the Conservatives in their opposition to Big Barry and his plans for rationed government healthcare and wealth redistribution?

Maybe, maybe not.

Will the Conservatives tuck their collective tails and try to show how they are nothing like this uncouth redneck from South Cakalaky? Will the Republicans fall for the rants from the left to vote for Big Barry’s plans out of shame and to show that they are nothing like this buffoon?

Where were all the lamestream media people who are currently screaming about Mr. Wilson’s behavior when President Bush got a shoe throw at him? Which is more aggressive? A shoe or a voice in the crowd? Seems to be just a wee bit of hypocrisy here…

And what of Big Barry’s umpteenth boring speech that actually went nowhere? Does ANYONE remember what his teleprompter told him to say?

Nor only no, but HELL NO!!!

Oh poor Big Barry, gave a speech and by the time it was finished it was forgotten in the uproar over what someone else said.

Someone who called him out on it.

Will the Republicans continue to hound the untruths, distortions, and takeover of the American Way of Life the rationed healthcare bill has in store for them or will they cower in fear of being another “Joe Wilson”?

Hell may have no fury like a woman scorned, but Mr. Wilson is facing the fury of the arrogance of Big Barry and a sycophantic, slavish media who is going to make this man’s life a pure hell.

Who dares raise their voice to speak out against this “Anointed” one, and even more so when Big Barry is delivering to us, us who are unworthy, a message of hope and change?

A good ol’ Southern boy who sees through the BS and having had enough of it, says so.

By the way, just WHAT did Big Barry talk about last night?

West Virginia Mountaineers and Kentucky Wildcats WIN!

A good way to start my football season!
Both the West Virginia Mountaineers and Kentucky Wildcats win their opening games!

Obama’s Address to the Students Indoctrination speech

First there was Al Gore and his idiotic movie that the government schools forced not only children but also their parents to watch. If the parents did not sit through that piece of trash, their children would receive failing grades. Can we say ‘Indoctrination of both the child and the parents’? Of course you can.

So… where does this idea of ‘talking straight to the youth” come from? Ever read a little book originally published February 21, 1848 by a couple of guys by the names of Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels?

Well, these two boys came up with this idea that is seems to be the basis for this administration.

Among their ideas is one of “Public Education”… it’s the Tenth Pillar.
Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

In that ‘free education’ is the idea that children should be taught to think a certain ‘approved’ way, ie: indoctrination.

Indoctrination of the young is a staple of the leftist ideology.

And what could be the ultimate in indoctrination? Having the President of United States talking to them. Oh… poo poo you say: now I going off on a ‘conspiracy kook’ thing at this point but… what’s to stop some of these teachers or ‘educators’ as they like to be known as (That has always had a kind of Orwellian feel to it as far as I am concerned too, but… I won’t take you down that road) from trying to personalize this broadcast with each of their little charges.

Well… Forgive me, but maybe I’m not entertaining a kook theory here: there seems to be a number of personalization ploys in their “first teacher guides” sent out:

*What is the President trying to tell me?
*What is the President asking me to do?
*What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?
• Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do? Is he asking anything of anyone else? Teachers? Principals? Parents? The American people?
After the speech, teachers will ask students:
*What do you think the President wants us to do?
*Does the speech make you want to do anything?
*Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us?
(This has been changed to less activist language now that isn’t as stringent in it’s exhortation to students to come up with ways to “help the president”. But it’s still a REAL peice of work…)

Government schools have a long track record of using students as junior activist lobbyists. It’s a tradition that cannot be ignored. Letter-writing campaigns for higher education spending, pro-immigration protest campaigns, environmentalist protests… even a campaign of fund raising for an impeached President…

Teacher’s ‘educators’ have zealously used their authority in some VERY heavy-handed ways to force their captive audiences into either writing/believing what they are told or the child would receive a failing grade, held back or be held up to public ridicule before their classmates.

And before you try to tell me how I have a ‘problem with authority’… I’ll give you that one.
I do! I have a real problem with someone who is supposed to teach my little snowflake math and then turns it into a political rant. If they want to teach politics, have them teach politics NOT math.

Do I have a chip on my shoulder against men and women who truly care about sharing their knowledge and making sure little Jack and Jill learn and can use what they do learn? NOT IN THE LEAST!!!

I could go through a list of men and women who over the years imparted to me knowledge that has held me in good steed. These are the unsung heroes of our time. They outnumber the poor excuses for ‘educators’ that I have known twenty to one. It is that one in twenty that disgust me and ruin the education system by turning it into an indoctrination system.

The system which will be furthered by the upcoming Address to Students indoctrination.

Where does this lead? Well, considering the willingness of this administration to spy on the citizens of this country, to take down names, and any information available on anyone it judges not in lock step or even questioning it… there have been others throughout history who have used these same tactics.

These tactics were pretty much perfected 70 years ago… along with indoctrinating the children to not only believe the way that was prescribed but to turn in anyone who risked speaking in any way not ‘approved’.

CNS News Service reports that “The Executive Office of the President is looking for a private contractor to capture and archive comments and information posted on social networking and new media sites where the White House has established a presence. While the Presidential Records Act (PRA) generally requires that the administration preserve information generated by the president and his staff, the White House says that in seeking to collect and preserve comments made by common citizens on social networking sites it is acting “out of an abundance of caution” to comply with the law.”

Yeah… i know i went a little off topic here, it just seemed to lead me this way… but when Big Barry and his fools brigade completely
cuts the parents out of the equation: no shock here – i mean, who do these parents THINK they are? WHAT RIGHT do they have to worry about what the all-knowing government propaganda schools are teaching their little snowflakes? Not only did he and his minions try to go around them in this attempt at just having a little talk with the children, his Education Secretary Arne Duncan also went past to school boards to send their indoctrination material to the school principals around the country.

i’ll finish with this thought: indoctrination of our youth, having them tell on their parents at school, at the doctor’s office… wait a minute… didn’t Big Barry just try something like that with their ‘rat each other out’ campaign to shut down the debate on healthcare a couple weeks ago: I’m going to let you think about that and consider the ramifications of indoctrination of our children and where it can lead on your own.

Locks of Love_______________________________ Guest blog by David Black Sr.

It has been several years now, since the last time I was given such a check on my emotional heartstrings in regards to the effect of childhood cancer.

My wife, who ensures that we give to a number of charities, provided transportation to take an eight-year-old daughter of one of her friends to donate her hair to Locks-of-Love. The charity group takes the virgin hair, donated by children, to make wigs for other children who are battling cancer.

“That’s really nice.” I told my wife as she relayed the experience to me.

Meanwhile, my thoughts roamed through the recesses of my mind and found a very specific memory.

“I need help posting the pictures…” She was explaining.

“Uh… Yeah.” I responded deftly, my thoughts still swirling, attempting to clarify the fuzzy picture of an old memory. “Maybe I’ll write a little piece you can post with the pictures, or I can post it on my friends blog.”

“Oh… OK.” She said thoughtfully, not sure of the idea. “Well. I have to get back to work. Love you.”

“OK… Love you, Baby.” I replied, the full force of that distant memory flooding into my consciousness.

As I said, it was several years ago. I was a local truck driver in the Los Angeles area. There I was; listening to the radio as I worked my way through the heavy L.A. traffic, which happened to be a daily event, when something different happened.

On this particular day, between the music sets, I was half-heartedly listening to the DJ interview people as they were promoting a fundraiser for St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital. Suddenly however, the interviewee captured my full attention.

“What would you do?” He began to relate his story.

You are walking down the street, and like any other day, being accosted by beggars, looking for a spare buck so they can get their next beer. Of course, you habitually decline. Then you feel someone tugging at your shirt, to get your attention.

When you turn, you have to look down to see the small, bald child who is summoning your assistance. You cannot help but give her your full attention.

“Excuse me, Sir.” She begins. “Can you afford to help me buy my next dose of medicine?”

“What?” You exclaim, astounded.

“Please, Sir?” The little girl pleads. “I have been diagnosed with cancer and without my next dose of medicine to fight it… Well, I will lose the fight.”

I had no choice. I pulled over to the side of the road and sat there, crying like a baby. I sat there thinking how brutal the guy’s message was. Then realized, his message was nowhere near as brutal as the daily life and death struggle of the little girl he described.

When I finished working that day, I stopped by an ATM and went to the remote broadcast location to make a cash donation. After all, it was the least I could do.

“Thank you, Sir.” I heard someone say shyly, as I purposefully dropped the money into the donation basket.

I looked to the voice and viewed a little girl, maybe ten years old, thin, gaunt, and wearing a ball cap to hide her bald head.

“You’re a St. Jude’s patient?” Was all my stunned brain could muster. “Shouldn’t you be at the hospital?

“Yes, I am.” She stated, cringing back slightly at my recognition of her condition, then added. “This is a good day though. Thank you.”

“You’re welcome.” I returned, flatly.

I abruptly turned and left. The impression of that day will, I believe, remain with me the rest of my life. The sight of that little girl, after having heard the story on the radio, seeing the easily fractured confidence, and her painfully high level of self-consciousness regarding her appearance, touched my heart. I hope I never lose the compassion I feel, whenever I think of that day.

Now, all these years later, I am grateful to hear that someone is trying to help these children regain their self-esteem. It makes me proud, that my wife took time to be a part of it. But mostly, I am touched at the thought of an eight-year-old little girl, along with a bunch of other children, selflessly donating their Locks-of-Love to other children they do not know.

God bless you all.

When i was asked if i would post this, i felt honoured to have the opportunity. Dave, thank you.

Trial Lawyers mean more to the Democrat’ic’ Healthcare machine than the American People

I find it ironic that one of THE MAJOR issues facing insurers today is the tremendously high cost of litigation and that this was INTENTIONALLY left out of ANY consideration by the writers of the rationed healthcare bill.

There has been various speculations on it but they were all laid to rest by Howard “AAAHHH!” Dean last Tuesday night at a town hall meeting in Reston, VA.

He said, and i quote: “Here is why tort reform is not in the bill. When you go to pass a really enormous bill like that the more stuff you put in, the more enemies you make, right? And the reason why tort reform is not in the bill is because the people who wrote it did not want to take on the trial lawyers in addition to everybody else they were taking on, and that is the plain and simple truth. Now, that’s the truth.”

They would RATHER take on the American public than the trial lawyers? The trial lawyers mean more to them than the American public?

I don’t see how anyone can think anything else from his answer to a question posed by an audience member.

When you think about it they DO NOT care about what the American People think. A majority of the member of both House of Congress have some background in the field of law. Their ‘friends’ are lawyers, and they are beholden to the Trial Lawyers Association through the massive campaign contribution they sell their souls to these people for.

If you are under the misguided idea that these so-called representatives actually consider what their constituents think, then tell me why they either WILL NOT hold town hall meetings to find out what their constituents think or they pack them with bussed-in SEIU union thugs and bar the very people from their own districts out.

Who do these so-called representatives think will be screaming in the streets for their removal and accomplishing that very thing in less than a year and a half? Or do they think that their constituents will forget and forgive when they throw in another markup in the next ’stimulate-us bill’?

Do they believe their are enough trial lawyers int heir districts to out vote the tsunami wave of resentment rushing toward them. Do they believe that all those bussed in SEIU union thugs will be able to out vote their own constituents?

After a while even union morons will get tired of riding from one polling place to the next voting for these ‘representatives’; that really does sound like more work than you can REALLY expect from a union goon.

Oh, i get it: Big Barry will just institute Marshal Law, sweep away the remains of the Constitution and declare that these ‘representatives’ are too valuable to be replaced and appoint them to their office for life.

Who NEEDS the American people and their vote then?

People may be upset that Howard “AAAAHHH” Dean said what he did, but i give the boy credit: He did tell us the truth. And think about this: he did it unashamedly.

So to answer my questions: Do the trial lawyers mean more to them than the American public? Would they RATHER take on the American public than the trial lawyers?

YES! on both counts and they are not hiding that fact, their disdain for the American Public, our votes, or their complete disregard for our opinions.